BEYOND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF SOCIOLOGY: THE CASE OF BEHAVIORISM AND ETHNOMETHODOLOGY

The paper focuses on an analysis of the potential impact that the behaviorist and ethnomethodological paradigms may have on academic sociology. Structural analysis in the sociology of sociology (Friedrichs, 1974; Mullins, 1973) is criticized and countered with an analysis which stresses the subjective process of theory acceptance and rejection exploiting Gouldner's concept of "domain assumptions" (1970). Utilizing data from a large survey of sociologists queried during the mid-sixties (Sprehe, 1967), the fit between various groupings of sociologists' "domain assumptions" and the "background assumptions " of each theory are analyzed. The results ofsuch an analysis suggest that ethnomethodology may be more attractive to certain groupings of sociologists than behaviorism, thus contradicting in part the argument advanced on the basis ofa structural analysis. The paper calls for a recognition of the dialectical interplay between "structural conditions" and "subjective forces" in the adoption and rejection oftheory

Sporobolus stapfianus: Insights into desiccation tolerance in the resurrection grasses from linking transcriptomics to metabolomics

Predominant clusters of SDATs that share distinct patterns of abundance during dehydration: A. Predominant patterns of abundance for transcripts in clusters that exhibited increased abundance during dehydration. B. Predominant patterns of abundance for transcripts in clusters that exhibited a decreased abundance during dehydration. (PDF 226 kb

Plant Adaptation to Drought --- Interdisciplinary Research at the University of Missouri [abstract]

Only abstract of poster available.Track V: BiomassDrought is the most important cause of crop failure in Missouri and limits plant productivity in large parts of the US and the world. Drought induces severe reductions in average annual crop yields on a regional scale and can have devastating effects at the farm level. Regional droughts can also strikingly reduce net primary productivity of natural ecosystems. Research on plant adaptation to drought is a long-standing, important component of MU faculty members, who comprise a strong, collaborative team of university and USDA-ARS scientists and are among the international leaders in drought research. Group members represent expertise from a broad range of disciplines, including plant physiology, agronomy, forestry, plant breeding, molecular biology, biotechnology, entomology, plant pathology, and soil science. Areas of research span from basic to applied aspects of plant adaptation to drought, fostering the translation of basic discoveries of underlying mechanisms to the delivery of more drought-tolerant crops at the doorsteps of American farmers. In addition to local collaborations, the team interacts with other scientists in the state of Missouri (e.g. Danforth Plant Sciences Center and Washington University in St. Louis) and at the national and international levels (including Australia, England, India, Mexico [CIMMYT], and The Philippines [International Rice Research Institute]). Active research projects conducted by the drought community at MU include research funded by state, federal, commodity group (e.g. Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council, United Soybean Board, Cotton Inc.) and private (Monsanto, Syngenta) sources. Of particular note, members of the group were recently awarded over $1.5 million from the Missouri Life Sciences Research Board to establish “rainout shelters” that will allow control of precipitation under field conditions. The ability to manage the timing, duration, and intensity of water deficit stress under field conditions is essential to examine plant responses to drought and interactions of drought and biotic stresses in mid-western environments. The track record of excellence in drought research and the broad range of expertise of the interdisciplinary group provide fertile grounds for creative and productive research endeavors that are directed to optimize crop and woody plant biomass production

Defects in muscarinic receptor-coupled signal transduction in isolated parotid gland cells after in vivo irradiation: evidence for a non-DNA target of radiation

Radiation-induced dysfunction of normal tissue, an unwanted side effect of radiotherapeutic treatment of cancer, is usually considered to be caused by impaired loss of cell renewal due to sterilisation of stem cells. This implies that the onset of normal tissue damage is usually determined by tissue turnover rate. Salivary glands are a clear exception to this rule: they have slow turnover rates (>60 days), yet develop radiation-induced dysfunction within hours to days. We showed that this could not be explained by a hypersensitivity to radiation-induced apoptosis or necrosis of the differentiated cells. In fact, salivary cells are still capable of amylase secretion shortly after irradiation while at the same time water secretion seems specifically and severely impaired. Here, we demonstrate that salivary gland cells isolated after in vivo irradiation are impaired in their ability to mobilise calcium from intracellular stores (Ca2+i), the driving force for water secretion, after exposure to muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonists. Using radioligand-receptor-binding assays it is shown that radiation caused no changes in receptor density, receptor affinity nor in receptor-G-protein coupling. However, muscarinic acetylcholine agonist-induced activation of protein kinase C alpha (PKCα), measured as translocation to the plasma membrane, was severely affected in irradiated cells. Also, the phorbol ester PMA could no longer induce PKCα translocation in irradiated cells. Our data hence indicate that irradiation specifically interferes with PKCα association with membranes, leading to impairment of intracellular signalling. To the best of our knowledge, these data for the first time suggest that, the cells' capacity to respond to a receptor agonist is impaired after irradiation